misplaced archaeology
Merch Industrial
GoonSwarm
   |
Posted - 2008.08.13 18:05:00 -
[1]
Not supported.
 Originally by: Jemaia
Not supported
1.) Moving PoSes is inhumane treatment of logistics personnel as it stands, having to move EVERY moon mining pos once every 3 months on top of the logistics nightmare is asking for people to simply quit the game outright.
This
Quote:
2.) As has been pointed out on the parody threads there are other forms of static income.
Yes
Quote:
3.) You being the one to propose such things is akin to a person claiming all people with blue eyes and brown hair (0.0 population) should be locked in a cage (PoS setups) and poked with sticks for your amusement, it's a sick sadistic sort of entertainment you probably come up with while sitting at home when you aren't role playing a lady of the night for some well hung caldari stud.
What
Quote:
4.) Over 2/3rds of your post is posturing with a sort of assumed setup for ad hominem towards anyone that would disagree. "Would CCP be prepared to shake up politics and over-stabilized borders in 0.0" anyone who doesn't support your form of torture is automatically assumed to be for over stabilized borders and not necessarily against your half witted ideas on things you yourself will never have to experience. It's akin to the whole abortion issue one side identifies as Pro-choice and the other Pro-life as if either is truly against freedom in choice or life itself.
I hate freedom. (there how goony is that? goony goons goon gooned)
Quote:
This sort of writing should be an automatic put off, if your argument cannot stand on it's own 2 feet without such posturing it deserves to die a cold death. If it stands only because people are too moronic to see through such posturing then it is deception.
Sometimes I wonder who really wants to destroy this game, Jade Constantine or GOONS, you seem to be the most intent on destruction thus far.
Hm.
Originally by: Innominate
Originally by: Jade Constantine
I hate successful 0.0 alliances. My T2 production business should be made more profitable. If you're not grandfathered into the T2 production business with BPOs you have no right to possess a long term source of income.
This edit seems a little extreme, but sadly it also looks accurate.
It used to be complexes, now it's Dyspro. T2 BPOs are a bit less profitable due to invention, but they're still quite the isk printing machine... and it still would be if this change were put in. They might even improve.
Grim Mercy: One of the things about t2 bpos is that there's even more of a 'huge imbalance between "Those that Have" and "Those that Want" and there is little recourse for anyone other than another huge 0.0 power bloc to do anything about it' except that not even a 'huge 0.0 power bloc' can do anything about it. The t2 BPOs belong to those that got into the game early. End of story, unless they actually want to get rid of them.
I wouldn't have any problem with increasing the viability of mining lowends and/or decreasing just how much the Dyspro isk fountains are worth, but it seems like the Jade's proposal is an attempt to nerf someone else's alliance level income while keeping his own intact.
|